I believe this is the same aversion shown in vampire movies where sunlight kills the vamps but regular light does nothing. Interesting that the film Legend also had a sun aversion for their infected but not to regular light either. It is true in the first film the infected had no aversion to light but they definitely had an aversion to the sun itself. That's plausible-that the virus mutated- but they were very explicit in the first film about only traveling during the day and the dangers the infected pose at night. Further, the new outbreak was caused my someone who was immune, meaning that since she reacted differently, she could also pass along the infection differently. The infected in the car scene probably just gave up trying to chase the car since it is too fast, and not because of some kind of photophobia, or heliophobia. Also, that the infected don't show any adversion to the well-lit army base, or in the beginning of the first film where they are set on fire, which obviously gives off light. Keep in mind that the two films take place at different points in time, and that the infection has had time to change, and that the infected deen in the street was starving. if you asked them, they would probably respond with "is it that important to you?" -Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.122.45.208 ( talk) 21:59, 12 September 2008 (UTC) I believe that since this movie is geared by the producers toward an audience that expects thrills to generate revenue, the producers do not care about any of this attention to detail.
What explanation is given for this sudden important shift from 28 Days Later to 28 Weeks Later? -Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.224.45.233 ( talk) 22:17, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
28 DAYS LATER MOVIE ICON FULL
Suddenly is 28 Weeks Later the boy arriving at the cottage is being chased in full daylight at the start of the film and no further mention or respect of the daylight aversion is ever mentioned or respected anywhere in the sequel. The only cases where the infected were in daylight was because they got infected while still in daylight or they were chained up outside in broad daylight or during the end of the movie flight overhead with an infected unable to walk, stuck in the middle of a road somewhere. A huge part of the reason the characters were able to travel around in 28 Days Later was due to the aversion of light by the infected. Likewise the infected would not come out until after darkness thus allowing for the bizarre post apocalyptic empty streets part of the first film to work plot-wise.
For example, in 28 Days Later the infected would not chase the car outside the tunnel. Demon Hunter Rules ( -) 01:00, 5 June 2008 (UTC)recycle bin Inconsistencies with 28 Days Later ĭoes anyone know the explanation as to why the 'infected' in 28 Weeks Later suddenly have no aversion to light? In 28 Days Later the infected would not chase anyone into the daylight nor come out of hiding from darkness. Cburnett ( talk) 04:30, 2 March 2008 (UTC) Where do i put this new image? įile:Kill'em.jpgSo where do i put this new image? cause i made this image for the 28 Day Later wikia. Eaglestorm ( talk) 02:25, 25 January 2008 (UTC) Why is that? This is an encyclopedia and such productions details of making the 16th world's largest city appear deserted is nothing trivial. :) Cburnett ( talk) -Preceding comment was added at 00:09, 25 January 2008 (UTC) How they did it this time needs sources, but I don't think it needs to be posted here IMO. I think this article needs the same but I don't know any details, especially since the scenes are more grand. ISBN 0791476774.Ģ8 Days Later#Production covers how they made scenes look deserted and desolate. Ecology and Popular Film: Cinema on the Edge. "Apocalypse as 'A Return to Normality' in 28 Days Later and 28 Weeks Later". References to use Please add to the list references that can be used for the film article.
0 kommentar(er)
